

Greg Sullivan: The short answer is: yes, that is correct. But I wanted to just let you go on the record and describe what exactly we're seeing in the video in terms of what's possible with Mesh. We all kind of sussed that out on our own, and we think we know that that is the case regarding Mesh. But one person raised the question: Hey, wait, what they're talking about right now is possible via simplistic avatars, but the more realistic, volumetric, holographic looking imagery that was represented in the video requires sensors. I think a lot of people got excited by it is because it not only looks like science fiction, but we now have the technology to do these things via the HoloLens and Kinect.
#Microsoft mesh for mac full
The following is an abbreviated version of the conversation, but if you want to hear the full chat, you can listen to the video embedded at the bottom of this page.Īdario Strange: First of all, referencing the beautiful Mesh demo video, it's incredible. So was the video accurate? If so, how could some of the things in the video be accomplished? And if Microsoft is really focused on the enterprise space, what was the meaning behind including consumer-focused examples, including that amazing Pokemon Go proof of concept? In order to unpack what Mesh really means for the HoloLens 2 and the AR space in general, we brought Microsoft's Greg Sullivan onto the virtual stage of Twitter Spaces to answer all of our questions about Mesh.
#Microsoft mesh for mac free
Imagine a service from Apple that was free and allowed you to sync multiple Apple products via the Internet. It would make a lot of sense that Apple may use Mobile Me to encompass syncing with its mobile devices and Me to encapsulate syncing all of its products. While “Mobile Me” seems to be one candidate, a new contender is out there: simply “Me.”Īpple now owns the domain Me.com, as Daring Fireball speculated about yesterday and MacRumors confirmed today. That could be about to change.Īs we noted a few days ago, there are rumors floating around that. Mac, but it’s overpriced and underpowered. It has a service that is used for synchronization. Apple, on the other hand, doesn’t suffer from that problem on the same scale since it makes all of its own computers and most of the products that sync with those computers.
